The lies and deceit used for the
continuation of the Vietnam war in 1968 failed. Fifty years later those very
same distortions are supported.
Why?
What’s the difference?
In 1968 we were told that our exit from Vietnam would surely spell Armageddon. Vietnam would be the first domino to fall resulting in a Communist takeover of all of Southeast Asia and from there the rest of the world. It didn’t happen. Surprise – Surprise.
Yet all the 24/7 cable news outlets are dragging out every retired American general on the face of the earth and every politician who owes their allegiance to the billions of dollars made through our war machine. Their old, tired, deceitful Vietnam Arguments are as erroneous today as they were in 1968.
This Is What "Minimal Casualties" Look Like
Today we are told our military exit from the Middle East will be – you guessed it – Armageddon, i.e. if we exit the Middle East Isis and al-Qaida will remerge as powerful forces. Hence the argument for us to never cease fire - for us to fight those wars forever. Retired General Ramsey Clark recently stated; “We are taking minimal casualties.” These are the same generals and the same politicians who demanded President Kennedy attack – bomb – Cuba as a solution to the 1962 missile crisis.
Here is what the “Forever War” crowd wants us to ignore:
· Most
recent pew poll – 69% of Americans want us out of the Middle East.
· We
spend $50 Billion a year in Afghanistan ALONE.
· In
both Syria and Afghanistan delusions, i.e., “democracy building” keeping
our shores safe (911 was planned in Hamburg, Germany) fuel continued fighting.
· Afghanistan
resolution – Seek out those responsible for 9-11 attacks.
· Osama
Bin Laden is dead - al-Qaida has lost its Impact
· Resolution
said nothing of “associated Force(s)”, War in Syria, Yemen or Mali
· Pakistan
aids enemy in Afghanistan – Do we declare war against Pakistan?
· Stated
objective - Drive Isis out of Syria.
Isis has lost 99% of its territory.
No comments:
Post a Comment